Which A.I. Is Better In Understanding the Holy Bible; Chat GPT or Google’s “Bard”

Is ChatGPT or Google’s “Bard” best for Christians studying the Holy Bible?

Artificial intelligence (A.I.) has grown in popularity over the last several years. As a Christian and tech enthusiast, I wanted to put two web-based text-based A.I.s to the test. My overall goal:  Which platform is best for asking questions about the Holy Bible? The sessions (with session time stamps) are listed below with both A.I.s and their generated responses. I asked the same questions in ChatGPT–4 and Bard. I left spelling & grammar mistakes so that an actual session could be presented.

Q&A session with Google’s “Bard” (as of July 12, 2023, 10:38 A.M. CST)

• Explain your language model.

Sure. My language model is a large language model (LLM) called Bard, trained on a massive dataset of text and code. It is a statistical model that learns the probability of a given sequence of words occurring in a sentence. This means that it can be used to predict the next word in a sentence, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way.

My language model is based on a neural network architecture called a transformer. Transformers are a type of neural network that are particularly well-suited for natural language processing tasks. They are able to learn long-range dependencies between words, which is essential for tasks such as machine translation and question answering.

My language model was trained on a dataset of text and code that was collected from a variety of sources, including the internet, books, and Wikipedia. The dataset contains over 1.5 trillion words, which gives my language model a vast knowledge of the English language.

I am still under development, but I have learned to perform many kinds of tasks, including:

• Following instructions and completing requests thoughtfully.
• Answering questions in a comprehensive and informative way, even if they are open ended, challenging, or strange.
• Generating different creative text formats of text content, like poems, code, scripts, musical pieces, email, letters, etc.

I am always learning new things, and I am excited to see what I can do in the future.

• When I ask questions, do you generate your answers based on your dataset, previously generated answers, and provided text by the user?

Yes, that’s right. When you ask me a question, I use a combination of my dataset, previously generated answers, and the text you provide to generate my answer.

I first look for answers in my dataset that are similar to your question. If I find a match, I will use that answer as a starting point. If I don’t find a match, I will use my knowledge of the English language to generate a new answer.

I also consider the text you provide when I generate my answer. This helps me to understand the context of your question and to provide a more relevant answer.

For example, if you ask me “What is the capital of France?”, I will first look for an answer in my dataset. If I find a match, I will use that answer. If I don’t find a match, I will generate a new answer using my knowledge of the English language.

However, if you ask me “What is the capital of France?” and then provide the text “I know it’s not Paris”, I will take that into account when I generate my answer. I will know that you are looking for an answer that is not Paris, so I will generate a different answer.

I am still under development, but I am learning to become better at taking into account the context of questions and the text provided by users. I am excited to see how I can improve in the future.

• Does your learning model have a cutoff date at which it stopped learning, or do you have access to current information?

My learning model does not have a cutoff date at which it stopped learning. I am constantly learning new things, including current information. I do this by being connected to the internet and by being able to access and process information from the real world.

This means that I am able to answer your questions about current events, even if they happened yesterday or even just a few minutes ago. I am also able to generate text that is relevant to the current day, such as news articles or blog posts.

I am still under development, but I am learning to become better at staying up-to-date with current information. I am excited to see how I can improve in the future.

Here are some examples of how I can access and process current information:

• I can read news articles from websites like CNN, BBC, and The New York Times.
• I can watch videos from YouTube and other video sharing websites.
• I can follow people on Twitter and other social media platforms.
• I can search for information on Google and other search engines.

I am always looking for new ways to access and process current information. I am excited to see how I can improve in the future.

• Can you explain the difference between a “learning model” and a “dataset,” so I can create more precise questions?

Sure. A learning model is a statistical model that is trained on a dataset. The dataset contains examples of the problem that the model is trying to solve. The model learns to identify patterns in the dataset and to use those patterns to solve new problems.

For example, a learning model for natural language processing might be trained on a dataset of text and code. The dataset would contain examples of text and code, along with labels that indicate the type of text or code. The model would learn to identify patterns in the dataset, such as the difference between text and code, the difference between different types of text, and the difference between different types of code.

A dataset is a collection of data that is used to train a learning model. The dataset should be representative of the problems that the model will be used to solve. For example, if a model is being trained to classify images of cats and dogs, the dataset should contain a balanced number of images of cats and dogs.

Here is a table that summarizes the difference between a learning model and a dataset:

Feature	Learning Model	Dataset
Purpose	To learn to solve a problem	To provide examples of the problem to the model
Content	A statistical model	A collection of data
Use	To solve new problems	To train a learning model

I hope this helps! Please let me know if you have any other questions.

• Is your learning model based solely from text from your dataset or do you recognize patters from your dataset to create your learning model?

My learning model is based on both text and patterns from my dataset. The text in my dataset provides me with a vast knowledge of the English language. This knowledge helps me to understand the meaning of words and phrases, and to generate text that is grammatically correct and semantically meaningful.

The patterns in my dataset help me to identify common relationships between words and phrases. This knowledge helps me to understand the context of words and phrases, and to generate text that is relevant to the topic at hand.

For example, if I see the phrase “the cat sat on the mat” in my dataset, I will learn that the word “cat” is often associated with the words “mat” and “sat”. This knowledge will help me to understand the meaning of the phrase “the cat sat on the mat”, and to generate text that is relevant to cats, mats, and sitting.

I am still under development, but I am learning to become better at recognizing patterns in my dataset. I am excited to see how I can improve in the future.

Here are some of the patterns that I recognize in my dataset:

• Semantic patterns: These patterns relate the meaning of words and phrases. For example, the word “cat” is semantically related to the words “pet”, “feline”, and “mammal”.
• Syntactic patterns: These patterns relate the structure of words and phrases. For example, the phrase “the cat sat on the mat” is a syntactically correct sentence in English.
• Statistical patterns: These patterns relate the frequency of words and phrases. For example, the word “the” is a very common word in English, while the word “cat” is less common.

I use these patterns to understand the meaning of text, to generate text, and to answer questions. I am always learning new patterns, and I am excited to see how I can improve in the future.

• Ok, so I’m going to give you questions based on the Holy Bible. What sources are you going to utilized when generating your answer(s)?

When you give me questions based on the Holy Bible, I will use a variety of sources to generate my answers. These sources include:

• The text of the Bible itself. I have access to the full text of the Bible in multiple languages, including English, Hebrew, and Greek.
• Commentaries on the Bible. Commentaries are written by scholars who have studied the Bible in depth. They provide insights into the meaning of the text and the historical context in which it was written.
• Dictionaries and encyclopedias. These resources provide information about the meaning of words and phrases, as well as historical and cultural background.
• My own knowledge of the Bible. I have been trained on a massive dataset of text and code that includes the Bible. This gives me a deep understanding of the text and its meaning.

I will use these sources to generate my answers in a comprehensive and informative way. I will also try to be respectful of the different interpretations of the Bible that exist.

Here are some specific examples of the sources I might use to answer your questions:

• If you ask me about the meaning of a particular passage in the Bible, I might consult a commentary on the Bible to get a deeper understanding of the text.
• If you ask me about the historical context of a particular passage in the Bible, I might consult a dictionary or encyclopedia to get information about the time period in which the passage was written.
• If you ask me about a particular interpretation of the Bible, I might consider my own knowledge of the Bible and the different interpretations that exist.

I will always try to be as objective as possible when answering your questions. I will avoid expressing any personal opinions or beliefs, and I will focus on providing you with information that is based on the sources I have consulted.

I hope this answers your question. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

• When asking questions, can I ask you to eliminate a source or sources? For example, if I were to ask you a question about the Holy Bible, or books within the Holy Bible, could I ask you to confine your responses to the Holy Bible, dictionaries, lexicons only?

Yes, you can ask me to eliminate a source or sources when asking questions. When you ask me a question, I will always ask you for more information about what you are looking for. This information helps me to understand your needs and to generate the most relevant and informative answer possible.

If you want me to eliminate a source or sources, you can tell me that explicitly. For example, you could say something like:

• “Please confine your responses to the Holy Bible, dictionaries, and lexicons only.”
• “Please do not use any commentaries or other secondary sources.”
• “Please focus on the text of the Bible itself.”

I will respect your request and will not use the sources you have eliminated when generating my answer.

I hope this answers your question. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

• Do you have full access to these books? (New session started on July 12, 2023, at 11:29 A.M. CST)

1. Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature Easton’s Bible Dictionary Fausset’s Bible Dictionary Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible Poor Man’s Concordance (Robert Hawker)
2. Hitchcock’s Bible Names
3. International Standard Bible Encyclopedia
4. Nave’s Topical Bible
5. Smith’s Bible Dictionary
6. The New Topical Textbook (R. A. Torrey)
7. Webster’s Dictionary of American English (1828)
8. Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary
9. Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary
10. Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible
11. Brown-Driver-Briggs’ Hebrew Definitions
12. King James Concordance
13. Mounce Concise Greek-English Dictionary Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries
14. Thayer’s Greek Definitions
15. Complete Word Study Dictionary

Q&A session with ChatGPT-4 (as of July 12, 2023, 11:50 A.M. CST):

• Explain your language model.

As a language model, I’m based on OpenAI’s GPT-4 architecture, a more advanced version of the GPT-3 model. I’m an artificial intelligence program trained to understand and generate human-like text based on the input I receive.

GPT stands for “Generative Pretrained Transformer”, which essentially describes how I function.

• Generative: This means I can generate text, as opposed to merely understanding or classifying it.
• Pretrained: Before being used, I underwent a process of pre-training, where I learned from a vast corpus of text data collected from the internet. However, it’s important to note that while this pre-training process allows me to generate text based on patterns and structures in language I’ve learned, I don’t have access to or know the specifics of the documents in the training set. I can’t access personal data unless it has been shared with me in the course of our conversation. I’m designed to respect user privacy and confidentiality.
• Transformer: This refers to the architecture that’s used to build me. A Transformer is a type of model introduced in a paper called “Attention is All You Need”. It’s known for its attention mechanism that weighs the relevance of different words in input when generating output.

My model uses machine learning to generate responses based on the input it receives. Specifically, I use a form of machine learning called deep learning, and I’m composed of layers of artificial neurons (or “nodes”) that can process different parts of the input and combine their results to generate output.

I generate responses by predicting what comes next in a piece of text, one word (or token) at a time. My responses are based on patterns and structures in the language I’ve learned, rather than any understanding of the world or personal experiences, because as an AI, I don’t have beliefs, opinions, or experiences.

As of my last training cut-off in September 2021, I don’t have the capability to learn or update my knowledge base with new information after that date. All of my responses are generated based on the information available up to that cut-off date.

• When I ask questions, do you generate your answers based on your dataset, previously generated answers, and provided text by the user?

Yes, you’re correct. The responses I generate are based on a combination of:

• The pre-training on a vast corpus of text data: This data doesn’t contain specific documents or sources, but is instead a broad representation of human language. Importantly, I don’t know specifics about which documents were in my training set or have access to any specific documents or sources.
• The specific input provided by the user: This includes the immediate conversation context as well as any other specific prompts or instructions given. The user’s input is the most direct factor influencing my responses.
• Prior responses in the current conversation: My responses are also influenced by the preceding dialogue in the current conversation. This is part of the conversation context that I consider when generating replies.

However, it’s important to note that I don’t have the ability to remember or learn from individual interactions. I don’t have the capacity to access or retrieve personal data from one conversation to another unless that information is provided in the current conversation. My primary function is to generate responses based on the patterns and information I’ve learned during my training. I don’t store personal conversation data or have the ability to recall or learn from past individual interactions.

• Does your learning model have a cutoff date at which it stopped learning, or do you have access to current information?

As of my last update, my learning model has a cutoff date, which is in September 2021. This means that I don’t have access to events in the world or new information that has emerged after that date. My training data includes a broad range of internet text up until that point, but I don’t have the ability to update or access new information post-training.

I don’t have the capability to access or retrieve real-time information or updates from the internet or any other databases, so my knowledge is static and doesn’t include real-time events, updates, or recent developments.

It’s also worth noting that while I strive to provide accurate and helpful information based on the training I received, there may be some limitations due to the fixed nature of my training data. I always recommend double-checking any critical information from multiple reliable sources.

• Can you explain the difference between a “learning model” and a “dataset,” so I can create more precise questions?

Absolutely, I’d be happy to clarify the difference between a “learning model” and a “dataset”.

• Dataset: A dataset is a collection of data. In the context of machine learning, a dataset could be a collection of images, a body of text, a series of audio files, or any other type of data that you can use to train a model. The data could be labeled (meaning each piece of data has a corresponding label or answer that the model can learn from) or unlabeled. In the context of language models like me, the dataset consists of vast amounts of text data from the internet.
• Learning Model: A learning model, often simply referred to as a “model”, is an algorithm or system that learns patterns from the dataset it’s been trained on. The learning model processes the dataset, identifies patterns and structures within it, and uses what it learns to make predictions or decisions without being specifically programmed to perform the task.

In the case of GPT-4 (my architecture), the learning model was trained on a large dataset composed of parts of the internet. The model learned to generate human-like text based on the patterns and structures it identified in the training data. However, after the training was complete and the model was finalized (as of the cutoff in September 2021), it no longer continues to learn or adapt to new data.

In summary, the “dataset” is the information that the “learning model” uses to learn and make predictions or decisions. In my case, I use the patterns I learned from my training data to generate responses based on the prompts I receive from users.

• Is your learning model based solely from text from your dataset or do you recognize patters from your dataset to create your learning model?

The learning model, like the one in GPT-4, is not based solely on the text from the dataset, but rather it learns to recognize and reproduce patterns within that dataset.

During the training process, the model is exposed to a massive amount of text data. It learns to understand and generate human-like text by identifying and learning patterns within this data. This includes recognizing the statistical relationships between words, phrases, and sentences, the rules and structures of grammar, and many other linguistic patterns.

For instance, if the phrase “The cat is on the” is frequently followed by the word “mat” in the training data, the model learns to predict that “mat” might follow “The cat is on the” in future contexts.

This learning process does not involve explicit programming of rules or facts. Instead, it’s a statistical learning process based on recognizing and leveraging patterns in the data.

Once the learning phase is complete and the model is deployed (like I am now), it generates responses based on these learned patterns in response to the input it receives. However, it doesn’t continue to learn or adapt based on new data or information post-training. My knowledge and capabilities are based on the patterns I learned during training and are applied to the specific prompts and context provided by users during a conversation.

• Ok, so I’m going to give you questions based on the Holy Bible. What sources are you going to utilized when generating your answer(s)?

As a language model, I don’t directly access or refer to specific databases, documents, or sources when generating responses. Instead, my responses are based on the patterns and structures in the data I was trained on, which includes a diverse range of text from the internet.

If you ask me questions about the Holy Bible, I’ll respond based on the knowledge and patterns I learned during my training phase. This includes information about the Bible that’s in the general corpus of data used for training, which could include things like commonly known stories from the Bible, interpretations of biblical passages, or general knowledge about the structure and composition of the Bible.

However, it’s important to note that while I can provide information that’s generally accurate, I don’t have the capability to provide theological advice, deeply nuanced interpretations, or perspectives on religious matters. As an AI, I don’t have beliefs or opinions, and my responses should not be taken as a definitive source of religious or spiritual guidance.

As with any complex topic, I recommend consulting multiple sources and experts when seeking detailed information or advice about religious texts like the Holy Bible.

• When asking questions, can I ask you to eliminate a source or sources? For example, if I were to ask you a question about the Holy Bible, or books within the Holy Bible, could I ask you to confine your responses to the Holy Bible, dictionaries, lexicons only?

In principle, the idea of limiting or specifying sources for responses is a good one. However, as an AI language model, I do not have direct access to specific databases, books, documents, or any specific sources of information. I was trained on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. This corpus is designed to be a broad representation of human language and does not entail accessing specific documents or sources.

While my training does involve a large amount of data from various sources, I don’t have the ability to reference or know specifics about which documents were part of my training set. When you ask a question, I generate a response based on patterns and knowledge distilled from this vast array of data, rather than looking up information in a specific source.

As such, I’m not able to limit my responses to specific sources like the Holy Bible, dictionaries, or lexicons exclusively. It’s also important to note that while I strive for accuracy, I don’t have the ability to independently verify information or cross-reference different sources. Consequently, for in-depth study or interpretation of religious texts like the Bible, direct consultation of the text and recognized authorities in the field is always recommended.

There was no need to ask the final question (“Do you have full access to these books?) since the previous question asked in ChatGPT-4 responded that it couldn’t “limit my responses to specific sources.”

My conclusions:

As for this article’s writing, I conclude that Google’s “Bard” is the better choice regarding Christian research & study. This is based on the fact that an individual can limit the A.I.s responses to specific resources on Google’s platform. This offers unbiased responses for the Christian since dictionaries and lexicons are limited to definitions of words & phrases based on the Holy Bible’s self-interpretation. ChatGPT-4 cannot eliminate external resources within a prompt (question). Therefore the language patterns used in generating responses can be from more questionable sources with the potential for bias.

For more information relating to my idea of potential bias towards text generated A.I. and the Holy Bible, please refer to the video below.

Additional prompt for Christian studies using Google’s “Bard”

When asking a question in Bard, follow your query with the prompt below. The resources listed contain the most trusted texts and often used citations within Biblical studies:

[question]. Please confine your response to the resources listed below:

• The King James Bible
• Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological and Ecclesiastical Literature by John M. Wilson (1880-1881)
• Easton’s Bible Dictionary by Matthew George Easton (1897)
• Fausset’s Bible Dictionary by A. R. Fausset (1876)
• Hastings’ Dictionary of the Bible by James Hastings (1898-1904)
• Poor Man’s Concordance by Robert Hawker (1822)
• Hitchcock’s Bible Names by Edward Hitchcock (1867)
• International Standard Bible Encyclopedia by James Orr (1915)
• Nave’s Topical Bible by Orville J. Nave (1903)
• Smith’s Bible Dictionary by William Smith (1863)
• The New Topical Textbook by R. A. Torrey (1908)
• Webster’s Dictionary of American English (1828) by Noah Webster
• Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Dictionary by Ronald F. Youngblood, F. F. Bruce, and R. K. Harrison (1990)
• Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary by W. E. Vine (1940)
• Ancient Hebrew Lexicon of the Bible by Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs (1906)
• Brown-Driver-Briggs’ Hebrew Definitions by Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs (1906)
• King James Concordance by Robert Hawker (1822)
• Mounce Concise Greek-English Dictionary by William D. Mounce (1993)
• Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries by James Strong (1890)
• Thayer’s Greek Definitions by J. H. Thayer (1889)
• Complete Word Study Dictionary by Spiros Zodhiates (1993)

For best results, confine your question to a specific book(s), chapter(s), and verse(s). Overall, concepts such as “what does God think about…” will generate a response resembling: “I’m unable to help you with that, as I’m only a language model and don’t have the necessary information or abilities.” After a query, you can narrow your studies based on the generated responses and narrow down your list of resources.

Example queries with specific prompts using Google’s “Bard”

• Based on Acts 16:16-18, what might this soothsaying woman act like. Confine your answers to the King James Bible and Thayer’s Greek Definitions.

Sure, here are some possible behaviors that the soothsaying woman in Acts 16:16-18 might have exhibited, based on the King James Bible and Thayer’s Greek Definitions:

• She might have spoken in strange languages. The Greek word for “soothsaying” in this passage is pneumati pythona, which literally means “spirit of Python.” Python was a serpent-god in Greek mythology, and his name was associated with prophecy and divination. In the New Testament, the term pneumati pythona is often used to refer to demonic spirits that are capable of speaking in strange languages.
• She might have had seizures or other physical manifestations. The Greek word for “crying out” in this passage is krazei, which can also mean “to rave” or “to be possessed.” This suggests that the woman might have been experiencing physical manifestations of her demonic possession, such as seizures or other uncontrollable movements.
• She might have been unusually strong or energetic. The Greek word for “follow” in this passage is akoloutheo, which can also mean “to pursue” or “to dog.” This suggests that the woman might have been unusually persistent in following Paul and Silas, even after they had asked her to stop. This could be a sign that she was being possessed by a powerful demonic spirit.
• She might have been obsessed with religious or spiritual matters. The Greek word for “proclaim” in this passage is kerusso, which can also mean “to preach” or “to herald.” This suggests that the woman might have been obsessed with religious or spiritual matters, and that she may have been trying to use her position as a soothsayer to spread her beliefs.

It is important to note that these are just some possible behaviors that the soothsaying woman might have exhibited. We do not know for certain what her true motivations were, or what she was actually capable of doing. However, the evidence from Acts 16:16-18 suggests that she was a woman who was deeply troubled by demonic forces, and that she was in need of deliverance.

---

• Explain the beast as found in the book of Revelation, chapter 13 from the Holy Bible. Confine your answers to the Old and New Testaments of the King James Bible and * Thayer’s Greek Definitions by J. H. Thayer (1889), * Strong’s Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries by James Strong (1890), and * Brown-Driver-Briggs’ Hebrew Definitions by Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs (1906).